• NR447-63089
• Modules
• Week 6 Assignment: Leadership Action Plan PowerPoint Slide Show (graded)

November 2019

Week 6 Assignment: Leadership Action Plan PowerPoint Slide Show (graded)

• Due
  Dec 8 by
  11:59pm
• Points
  200
• Submitting
  a file upload

Leadership Action Plan

PowerPoint Slideshow Guidelines

Updated 9/2019

Purpose

The purpose of this PowerPoint presentation is to present the best
plan of action, as a leader, assigned to make a change to a problem or
issue in your place of work. If you are not presently working, use
information from your prelicensure experience or previous healthcare
experience. You will be using the Joint Commission National Patient
Safety Goals to align with the problem or issue that you see in your
workplace or most recent place of employment. You will prepare a
PowerPoint presentation and share how you will meet one of the goals in
your place of work that will solve the problem or issue you have
selected.

Course Outcomes

Completion of this assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

CO1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in the
provision of high-quality nursing care, healthcare team management, and
the oversight and accountability for care delivery in a variety of
settings. (PO2)

CO2: Implement patient safety and quality improvement initiatives
within the context of the interprofessional team through communication
and relationship building. (PO3)

CO3: Participate in the development and implementation of imaginative and creative strategies to enable systems to change. (PO7)

CO7: Apply leadership concepts in the development and initiation of
effective plans for the microsystems and system-wide practice
improvements that will improve the quality of healthcare delivery. (POs 2
and 3)

CO8: Apply concepts of quality and safety using structure, process
and outcome measures to identify clinical questions as the beginning
process of changing current practice. (PO8)

Due Dates

This assignment is to be submitted by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, end of Week 6.

Points

This assignment is worth 200 points.

Directions

1. Develop a PowerPoint slideshow consisting of 8-15 slides. Include
   the following. Title slide, written speaker notes, and Reference slide.
   Do not use Voice Over recordings. All information needs to be written in slides and speaker notes. No information in comment section will be graded.
2. You are required to complete the assignment using the productivity
   tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word
   2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version)
   for MAC. You must save the file in the “.pptx” format. A later version
   of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to
   Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu (Links to an external site.). Click on the envelope at the top of the page.
3. As the leader, you have identified a problem or issue related to one
   of the National Patient Safety Goals 2019 created by the Joint
   Commission that will lead to quality improvement. You will find the
   National Patient Safety Goals using this link: https://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/2019_HAP_NPSGs_final2.pdf. (Links to an external site.)Assess
   the problem or issue. State the problem/issue and identify three
   rationales (reasons) that the problem exists. References are used. Scholarly articles must be published within the last 5 years, peer-reviewed, from the Chamberlain library only and must provide the permalink
4. Review the information provided in our library on how to search for journal articles (Links to an external site.).
5. Review the information provided in the library on how to locate and copy a journal permalink (Links to an external site.). (Links to an external site.)
6. Assess the problem or issue. State the problem/issue and identify
   three rationales (reasons) that the problem exists. References are used.
7. Determine the people who are involved in the issue and explain three
   reasons as to how their role will contribute to the problem or issue
   solution.
8. Identify three solutions and discuss the purpose, cost and desired outcome.
9. Pick one solution to share with the director and discuss why this
   solution was chosen over the others. Use a scholarly reference.
10. Make an action plan to share the solution with the director and staff.
11. Summarize issue, plan and desired outcome and purpose for quality improvement on slide.
12. Reflect on your learning and value of doing the assignment.
13. Include written speaker notes for all slides except title slide and reference slide.
14. Submit your PowerPoint slideshow by 11:59 p.m. MT, Sunday, end of Week 6.

Best Practices in Preparing PowerPoint Presentations

The following are best practices in preparing this presentation.

• Be creative.
• Incorporate graphics, clip art, or photographs to increase interest.
• Make easy to read with short bullet points and large font.
• Review directions thoroughly.
• Proofread prior to final submission.
• Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission.
• Abide by the Chamberlain academic integrity policy.

Reminder

Before preparing your assignment, please review this “Crediting Sources Made Simple (Links to an external site.)“
resource. This tool is intended to help you understand scholarly
writing, APA, referencing, and crediting. Please reach out to your
instructor with any questions as you prepare your assignment.

**Academic Integrity**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All
students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it
in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content
contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited
appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this
assignment.

Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.

Rubric

NR447_Leadership

NR447_Leadership

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Title slide
Slide contains pertinent information related to assignment, course, student, date, and faculty member.

10.0 pts Slide contains all pertinent information related to assignment, course, student, date, and faculty member

9.0 pts Slide contains most information; however, one component is missing.

8.0 pts Slide contains most information; however, two to three components are missing.

4.0 pts Slide contains some information; and more than three components are missing or slide is missing.

0.0 pts Title slide is missing.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
An issue is
determined based on the National Patient Safety Goals 2019 PDF and there
are facts with support from references explaining why it is an issue.
References are used. Scholarly article must be published within the last
5 years, peer-reviewed, from the Chamberlain library only and must
provide the permalink.

20.0 pts At least three reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are directly related to the issue selected based on the National Patient Safety Goals. References are used. Scholarly article must be published within the last 5 years, peer-reviewed, from the Chamberlain library only and must provide the permalink.

18.0 pts Two reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are mostly related to the National Patient Safety Goals. References are included. Scholarly article must be published within the last 5 years, peer-reviewed, from the Chamberlain library only and must provide the permalink.

16.0 pts One reason is included and is logical and easy to read and are somewhat related to the National Patient Safety Goal. Few references are used. Scholarly article must be published within the last 5 years, peer-reviewed, from the Chamberlain library only and must provide the permalink.

8.0 pts One reason is included but is not logical or easy to read and is not from the patient’s perspective. No references are used.

0.0 pts No reasons given to support why the issue is a concern or issue is not a National Patient Safety Goal.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
List the people who
are involved in the issue and explain three reasons as to how their role
will contribute to the problem or issue solution.

30.0 pts People involved are listed and three reasons are included. Reasons are logical and discuss how their role will contribute to the problem or issue solution.

26.0 pts People involved are listed and two reasons are included. Reasons are logical and mostly discuss how their role will contribute to the problem or issue solution.

24.0 pts People involved are listed and one reason is included. Reason is logical and mostly discuss how their role will contribute to the problem or issue solution.

11.0 pts People involved are not listed OR reasons are not included.

0.0 pts People involved are not listed AND reasons are not included.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Discuss solutions to the problem weighing the stakeholders, cost, and reachable outcomes of each solution.

30.0 pts Three solutions are listed and data related to the problem with discussion of the differences between each solution are noted thoroughly and clearly.

26.0 pts Two solutions are listed and data related to the problem with discussion of the differences between each solution are noted clearly.

24.0 pts Two solutions are listed and data related to the problem with discussion of the differences between each solution is briefly discussed, omitting some information.

11.0 pts One solution is listed and data related to the problem with discussion of the solution is noted.

0.0 pts No solutions are noted or discussed.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Picks one solution
to share with the director and discusses why this solution was chosen
over the others. Scholarly article must be published within the last 5
years, peer-reviewed, from the Chamberlain library only and must provide
the permalink.

30.0 pts One solution is chosen. Thoroughly describes why this solution was better than the other one and supports this idea clearly with a reference. Scholarly article must be published within the last 5 years, peer-reviewed, from the Chamberlain library only and must provide the permalink.

26.0 pts One solution is chosen. Mostly describes why this solution was better than the other one and supports this idea clearly with a reference. Scholarly article must be published within the last 5 years, peer-reviewed, from the Chamberlain library only and must provide the permalink.

24.0 pts One solution is chosen. Briefly describes why this solution was better than the other one but lacks clear support for this idea. Does not use a reference.

11.0 pts One solution is chosen. Description is not clear and does not explain why the other solution was not chosen. No references were used.

0.0 pts No solution was chosen or described. No references were used.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Shares best approach to deliver solution to director and staff.

30.0 pts Best approach to deliver solution to director and staff is thoroughly described in detail.

26.0 pts Best approach to deliver solution to director and staff is somewhat described in detail.

24.0 pts Best approach to deliver solution to director and staff is briefly described in detail.

11.0 pts Best approach to deliver solution to director and staff is described but difficult to ascertain.

0.0 pts Best approach to deliver solution to director and staff is not noted.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Summary of issue, plan, and desired outcome for the plan is clear and relates to the previous slides.

20.0 pts Summary is clear and relates to the previous slides including the issue, purpose for quality improvement and desired outcomes.

18.0 pts Summary is noted and relates to the previous slides including the issue, purpose for quality improvement, and desired outcomes.

16.0 pts Summary is briefly noted and may or may not relate to the previous slides including the issue, purpose for quality improvement, and desired outcomes.

8.0 pts Summary is not clear and may or may not relate to the previous slides including the issue, purpose for quality improvement, and desired outcomes. Some pieces may be omitted.

0.0 pts No summary is completed.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Reflection of learning is displayed with lists, bulleted items, or other creative ways.

20.0 pts Thoroughly reflects learning related to leadership action plan assignment including value of data.

18.0 pts Generally reflects learning related to leadership action plan assignment including value of data.

16.0 pts Briefly reflects learning related to leadership action plan assignment including value of data.

8.0 pts Minimally reflects learning related to leadership action plan assignment does NOT include value of data.

0.0 pts Reflection on learning related leadership action plan assignment including value of data, is missing or so brief that understanding of concepts is difficult to ascertain.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Writing and
formatting. Slides are provided and labeled appropriately. Punctuation
and sentence structure are correct. There is evidence of spell and
grammar check. References are in APA format.

10.0 pts All slides are provided and grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. There is evidence of spell and grammar check. References are in correct APA format

9.0 pts Minimal errors in grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted. Minimal indicators of spelling or grammar errors. References are in correct APA format

8.0 pts Several errors in grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted. There are several indicators of spelling or grammar errors. References are not in correct APA format

5.0 pts Numerous errors in punctuation, or sentence structure noted. There are many indicators of spelling or grammar errors. References are not in correct APA format

0.0 pts Many errors in writing to the extent that it is difficult to understand the meaning of the information presented on the slides. References are not in correct APA format

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Speaker Notes Present

0.0 pts 0 point deducted Speaker Notes Present – no deduction in points

0.0 pts Points deducted Speaker notes not present on 80% of the slides results in a 10% deduction (20 points).

0.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Late Deduction

0.0 pts 0 points deducted Submitted on time

0.0 pts Not submitted on time – Points deducted 1 day late = 10 deduction; 2 days late = 20 deduction; 3 days late = 30 deduction; 4 days late = 40 deduction; 5 days late = 50 deduction; 6 days late = 60 deduction; 7 days late = 70 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late

0.0 pts