Research Critique and PICOT Statement Final Draft
Description
Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment,
Benchmark – Research Critique and PICOT Statement Rough Draft. Use the
feedback to make appropriate revisions and submit your final draft of
1,500-1,750 words.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA
Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not
required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to
beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Rubic
Research Critique and PICOT Statement Final Draft
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
65.0 %Content |
||||||
3.0 % |
The research problem or purpose of study is not mentioned. |
There are some inaccuracies in describing the research problem. |
The research problem and purpose are present and mostly accurate. |
The research problem and purpose are described with reference to nursing. |
The problem and purpose of the study are |
|
3.0 % |
The research objective, questions, or |
There are some inaccuracies describing the research objective, questions or hypotheses. |
The research objective, questions, or hypotheses are present and mostly accurate. |
The research objective, questions, or hypotheses are described and related to study methods. |
Research question is clearly and accurately |
|
3.0 % |
Literature review is not mentioned. |
There are some inaccuracies describing the literature review. |
The literature review elements are discussed and support the purpose of the study. |
The literature review and how it supports the purpose of the study are described. |
The literature review critique is thorough |
|
3.0 % |
The conceptual/theoretical framework is not mentioned. |
There are some inaccuracies in describing the conceptual/theoretical framework. |
The conceptual/theoretical framework elements are present and mostly accurate. |
The conceptual/theoretical framework is described. |
The conceptual/theoretical framework is |
|
3.0 % |
Protection of human participants is not critiqued. |
Some of the study tools are critiqued. Ethical issues are not addressed for quantitative design. |
The study tools are critiqued. Ethical issues are discussed for quantitative design. |
The study tools are critiqued using research |
The study tools are thorough, clear and |
|
3.0 % |
Data collection methods are not critiqued. |
Data collection methods are critiqued, but not to the full extent or not including ethical issues. |
Data collection methods and potential biases |
Data collection methods are critiqued and |
Data collection methods are fully critiqued, |
|
5.0 % |
No problem statement is provided. |
The critique of the problem statement is |
The critique of the problem statement meets |
The critique of the problem statement meets |
The critique of the problem statement meets |
|
3.0 % |
Data analysis or management is not critiqued. |
Data analysis is described. Significance and |
Data analysis is described and linked to |
Data analysis is critiqued and tied to |
Data analysis is accurately critiqued and |
|
6.0 % |
The quality of the study and implications |
The quality of the study and implications |
The quality of the study and implications |
The quality of the study and implications |
The quality of the study and implications |
|
3.0 % |
Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings. |
Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing. |
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice. |
Conclusion summarizes utility of the |
Conclusion summarizes utility of the |
|
5.0 % |
A nursing practice problem is not clearly described. |
PICOT describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources. |
A nursing practice problem is described with a few reliable sources. |
PICOT articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources. |
PICOT clearly articulates a problem relevant |
|
5.0 % |
Discussion of the link between the PICOT |
Discussion of the link between the PICOT |
Discussion of the link between the PICOT |
Discussion of the link between the PICOT |
Discussion of the link between the PICOT |
|
5.0 % |
The proposed evidence-based practice change is not included. |
The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete or incorrect. |
The proposed evidence-based practice change |
The proposed evidence-based practice change |
The proposed evidence-based practice change |
|
15.0 % |
Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision. |
Incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete. |
Incorporation of feedback and evidence of revision are present. |
Evidence of incorporation of feedback and revision is clearly provided. |
Evidence of incorporation of feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed. |
|
30.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
||||||
10.0 % |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. |
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis is clear and forecasts the |
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the |
|
10.0 % |
Statement of purpose is not justified by the |
Sufficient justification of claims is |
Argument is orderly, but may have a few |
Argument shows logical progressions. |
Clear and convincing argument that presents a |
|
10.0 % |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
5.0 %Format |
||||||
2.0 % |
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Template is used, but some elements are |
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
|
3.0 % |
Sources are not documented. |
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
Sources are completely and correctly |
|
100 % Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?Get your assignment on Research Critique and PICOT Statement Final Draft completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW |
References:
Nursing Standards
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. (2018). Code of conduct for midwives. https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Professional-standards.aspx
Clinical Guidelines
Guideline Adaption Committee. (2016). Clinical practice guidelines and principles of care for people with dementia. NHMRC Partnership Centre for Dealing with Cognitive and Related Function Decline in Older People. https://cdpc.sydney.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/CDPC-Dementia-Guidelines_WEB.pdf
Living Guideline
Stroke Foundation. (2022). Australian and New Zealand living clinical guidelines for stroke management – chapter 1 of 8: Pre-hospital care. https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/NnV76E
Evidence-based practice
BMJ Best Practice
Goldfarb, S., & Josephson, M. (2020). Cystic fibrosis. BMJ Best Practice. https://bestpractice.bmj.com/
Schub, T., & Cabrera, G. (2018). Bites: Head lice [Evidence-based care sheet]. Cinahl Information Systems. https://www.ebscohost.com
Beyea, S. C., & Slattery, M. J. (2006). Evidence-based practice in nursing: A guide to successful implementation. http://www.hcmarketplace.com/supplemental/3737_browse.pdf
JBI: Evidence summary
Swe, K. K. (2022). Blood glucose levels: Self-monitoring [Evidence summary]. JBI EBP Database. https://jbi.global
JBI: Best practice information sheet
Bellman, S. (2022). Experiences of living with juvenile idiopathic arthritis [Best practice information sheet]. JBI EBP Database, 24(1), 1-4.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Srijithesh, P. R., Aghoram, R., Goel, A., & Dhanya, J. (2019). Positional therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010990.pub2
Drug Information
Codeine. (2023, January). In Australian medicines handbook. Retrieved February 2, 2023, from https://amhonline.amh.net.au
Colorado State University. (2011). Why assign WID tasks? http://wac.colostate.edu/intro/com6a1.cfm
Dartmouth Writing Program. (2005). Writing in the social sciences. http://www.dartmouth.edu/~writing/materials/student/soc_sciences/write.shtml
Rutherford, M. (2008). Standardized nursing language: What does it mean for nursing practice? [Abstract]. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 13(1). http://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ThePracticeofProfessionalNursing/Health-IT/StandardizedNursingLanguage.html
Wagner, D. (n.d.). Why writing matters in nursing. https://www.svsu.edu/nursing/programs/bsn/programrequirements/whywritingmatters/
Writing in nursing: Examples. (n.d.). http://www.technorhetoric.net/7.2/sectionone/inman/examples.html
Perth Children’s Hospital. (2022, April). Appendicitis [Emergency Department Guidelines]. Child and Adolescent Health Service. https://www.pch.health.wa.gov.au/For-health-professionals/Emergency-Department-Guidelines/Appendicitis
Department of Health. (n.d.). Who is being active in Western Australia? https://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/Articles/U_Z/Who-is-being-active-in-Western-Australia
Donaldson, L. (Ed.). (2017, May 1). Healthier, fairer, safer: The global health journey 2007-2017. World Health Organisation. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241512367
NCBI Bookshelf
Rodriguez Ziccardi, M., Goyal, G., & Maani, C. V. (2020, August 10). Atrial flutter. In Statpearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK540985/
Royal Perth Hospital. (2016). Procedural management: Pre and post (24-48 hours) NPS. Canvas. https://courses.ecu.edu.au
Explanation & Answer
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.