oral presentation is to inform a group of community residents that a superfund site exists in the community

Unit _9_ assignment grading rubric.
Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in
Content Rubric
Introductory – Not
submitted or largely
incomplete. Work may
indicate very little if
any comprehension of
content.
0 – 1.9
Provided background information about the chosen NPL site.
Discussed the major organizations involved in
environmental and occupational health protection in
relation to the chosen NPL site.
Explained the risk assessment process at the chosen NPL
site, including:
1.Site assessments and testing
2.Hazardous agents present
3.Extent of the contamination
4.How the site has negatively affected the environment
and health of nearby residents
Described the past and current risk management activities
at the chosen NPL site.
The presentation demonstrated an understanding of the
problems associated with the effects of the environment
on the public’s health.
Slide presentation follows the Assignment instructions,
including:
?Slides are properly formatted and visually pleasing.
?A minimum of 3 minutes total of oral recordings for the
entire presentation.
?Exceptional oral voice recordings for each slide.
Writing Deduction Rubric (everyone starts
with 4’s = no deductions)
Introductory
0-1
Grammar & Punctuation
The overall meaning of the
paper is difficult to
understand. Sentence
structure, subject verb
agreement errors, missing
prepositions, and missing
punctuation make finding
meaning difficult.
Spelling
The many misspelled words
and incorrect words choices
significantly interfere with the
readability.
Order of Ideas & Length Requirement
Paper has some good
information or research, but it
does not follow assignment
directions and is lacking in
overall organization and
content.
APA
There is some attempt at
APA formatting and citing.
There are one or more
missing parts such as the
cover page or references list.
Citation information may be
missing. Citation mistakes
make authorship unclear.
Feedback:
ween 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column.
Total available points =
Emergent – Work
shows some
comprehension but
errors indicating
miscomprehension
may be present.
2 – 2.9
Practiced – Work
indicates overall
progress toward
comprehension. Minor
errors may present.
Proficient/Mastered Work is complete and
indicates full
comprehension of
content.
3 – 3.9
4
Emergent
Practiced
Proficient/Mastered
2
3
4
Score
Score
Several confusing
sentences or 1 to 2
confusing paragraphs make
understanding parts of the
paper difficult, but the
overall paper meaning is
clear. Many subject verb
agreement errors, run-on
sentences, etc. cause
confusion.
A few confusing sentences
make it difficult to
understand a small portion
of the paper. However, the
overall meaning of a
paragraph and the paper
are intact. There may be a
few subject verb agreement
errors or some missing
punctuation.
There are one or two confusing
sentences, but the overall
sentence and paragraph
meanings are clear. There are a
few minor punctuation errors
such as comma splices or runon sentences.
4
Many typos, misspelled
words, or the use of
incorrect words making
understanding difficult in a
few places.
A few misspelled words normally
Some misspelled words or
caught by spellcheckers are
the misuse of words such as
present but do not significantly
confusing then/than.
interfere with the overall
However, intent is still clear.
readability of the paper.
4
The order of information is
confusing in several places
and this organization
interferes with the meaning
or intent of the paper.
However, the paper has a
generally discernible
purpose and follows
assignment directions
overall.
The overall order of the
information is clear and
The order of information is contributes to the meaning of
confusing in a few places
assignment. There is one
and the lack of organization paragraph or a sentence or two
interferes with the meaning that are out of place or other
or intent of the paper in a
minor organizational issues. A
minor way.
few sentences may be long and
hard to understand. Meets length
requirements.
4
This is an attempt use APA
formatting and citing. There
are both in-text citations
and reference listings.
Citation information may be
missing or incorrect (i.e.
Websites listed as in-text or
reference citations). There
is an attempt to cite all
outside sources in at least
one place. Authorship is
generally clear.
There is an overall attempt
at APA formatting and
citation style. All sources
appear to have some form
of citation both in the text
and on a reference list.
There are some formatting
and citation errors. Citations
generally make authorship
clear.
4
There is a strong attempt to cite
all sources using APA style.
Minor paper formatting errors
such as a misplaced running
head or margins may occur.
Minor in-text citation errors such
as a missing page number or a
misplaced date may occur.
Quotation marks and citations
make authorship clear.
Total available points =
140
Weight
Final Score
10%
0,00
15%
0,00
30%
0,00
15%
0,00
10%
0,00
20%
0,00
Content
Score
Weight
0
Final Score
35%
1,40
35%
1,40
20%
0,80
10%
0,40
Writing 0
Deduction
Final Score
0
Percentage
0%

Purchase answer to see full
attachment