Discuss data mining and interpretation influences case management and utilization in healthcare from an APN perspective.
Description
Instructions:
- Describe and evaluate the differences between evidence based practice and research.
- Describe the importance and application of health care information, data mining, and importance to application in patient care outcomes
- Discuss how data mining and interpretation influences case management and utilization
- Describe participation in managed care and the importance of quality care initiatives and performance indicators (remember to use AHRQ as a resource)
Parameters:
1500 words not including the cover page and references (total, not for each topic)
Follow the APA 6th edition for references and citations
Include a minimum of 6 scholarly references (does not include text or websites)
Demonstrate analysis, evaluation and synthesis of information
Name: NU626 Paper Rubrics –
5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | Non-Performing | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Abstract and Introduction (10 points) | Points:10 (8%)
Abstract is well defined and demonstrates strong outline and purpose of the paper. Introduction of paper is strong as evidenced by clear delineation of main topic, key question(s),/terminology. Thorough introduction of background and how it relates to topic provided Accurate and clear identification of subtopics reviewed Clear and specific purpose statement |
Points:8 (6.4%) Abstract defined and demonstrates outline purpose of the paper Introduction of paper provides evidence of main topic, key question(s) /terminology. Good introduction of background and how it relates to topic provided Clear purpose statement |
Points:6 (4.8%) General and non-descript abstract is provided with minimal regard to outline or purpose of the paper Conveys general topic, but not subtopics. Provides a general purpose, non-descript purpose statement |
Points:4 (3.2%) Conveys topic, but not key question(s). Limited background information and purpose of the study is provided Subtopics are not reviewed. Nonspecific thesis statement |
Points:2 (1.6%) Does not adequately convey topic. Insufficient background information. Author is vague on the purpose of the paper. Does not describe subtopics to be reviewed. Lacks theses statement |
Points:0 (0%) Student did not complete this portion of the assignment. |
Body of Paper/Literature Review (50 points) |
Points:50 (40%) Research/scholarly evidence selected is highly relevant to the topic. Research is well presented; accurately and completely; including the method, results, and implications. Relationship between research and direction of author topic is clearly articulated and accurate. |
Points:40 (32%) Research/scholarly evidence is relevant to the topic. The research presented is mostly accurate and complete. There are some unclear components or some minor errors in presentation of methods, results, or implications. The topic is relevant and accurately described. |
Points:30 (24%) Research/scholarly evidence is relevant to the topic. The research presented is may have some non-specific related content. Missing research that could contribute greater to the analysis of the topic. There are some unclear components or some minor errors in presentation of methods, results, or implications. The topic is relevant and accurately described. Some components may not be present or are unclear. |
Points:20 (16%) Research/scholarly evidence is discussed but not consistently congruent with the topic. Minimal discussion and presentation of research methods, results, and implications. |
Points:10 (8%) Minimal research/scholarly evidence is discussed. Minimal discussion and presentation of research methods, results, and implications. |
Points:0 (0%) Student did not complete this portion of the assignment. |
Analysis/Synthesis (45 points) |
Points:45 (36%) Thorough synthesis and analysis of concepts provided Indicates a high level of understanding of body of literature related to topic of literature Essential findings of multiple sources are accurately and concisely paraphrased, analyzed, and integrated Detailed discussion in synthesis includes thorough examination of research designs and data Highly detailed discussion thoroughly addresses comparison between articles and how literature review supports authors paper topic. |
Points:35 (28%) Thorough synthesis and analysis of concepts provided Indicates a moderate level of understanding of body of literature related to topic of literature Most literature review findings of multiple sources are accurately and concisely paraphrased, analyzed, and integrated Moderate discussion in synthesis includes examination of research designs and data Semi- detailed discussion thoroughly addresses comparison between articles and how literature review supports authors paper topic. |
Points:25 (20%) Synthesis and analysis of concepts is provided Indicates a moderate understanding of body of literature related to topic Some literature review findings of multiple sources are Semi-accurately and concisely paraphrased, analyzed, and integrated Moderate discussion in synthesis includes examination of research designs and data Semi- detailed discussion addresses comparison between articles and how literature review supports authors paper topic. |
Points:15 (12%) Synthesis and analysis of concepts is provided but indicating further need of understanding of literature Indicates a minimal understanding of body of literature related to topic Some literature review findings are discussed and from minimal sources Minimal discussion in synthesis includes examination of literature, research designs and data Non- detailed discussion about comparison between articles and how literature review supports authors paper topic |
Points:5 (4%) Minimal synthesis and analysis of the concepts Indicates a minimal understanding of body of literature related to topic Minimal literature review findings are discussed and from minimal sources Minimal discussion in synthesis of examination of literature, research designs and data Non- detailed discussion about comparison between articles and how literature review supports authors paper topic |
Points:0 (0%) Student did not complete this portion of the assignment. |
Conclusion/Summary (10 points) |
Points:10 (8%) Conclusion is clearly stated. Strong review of key conclusions. Strong integration with thesis statement. Insightful discussion of impact of the researched material on topic. |
Points:8 (6.4%) Conclusion is clearly stated. Strong review of key conclusions. Strong integration with thesis statement. Discusses impact of researched material on topic. |
Points:6 (4.8%) Conclusion is clearly stated but not clearly connected to the body of work and analysis of the paper. Review of key conclusions. Some integration with thesis statement. Discusses impact of researched material on topic. |
Points:4 (3.2%) Conclusion may not be clear and the connections to analysis of paper are incorrect, unclear, or just a repetition of the findings without explanation. |
Points:2 (1.6%) Conclusion has major flaws; connection to analysis of paper is not clear. Does not summarize evidence with respect to thesis statement. Does not discuss the impact of researched material on topic |
Points:0 (0%) Student did not complete this portion of the assignment. |
APA Grammar, mechanics, and writing style (5 points) |
Points:5 (4%) Excellent and consistent sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, and spelling is consistently evident. Less than 0- 2 errors in paper. Excellent continuity in presentation of ideas, smoothness, and economy of expression, Excellent demonstration of precision and clarity. Paper is focused and unified. Words are chosen effectively. Excellent transitions between points. Consistently anticipates reader’s need for information, explanation, and context. Minimal of 1000 to 1500 words in body of paper. Not including cover or reference page. |
Points:4 (3.2%) Mostly consistent sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, and spelling are strong despite occasional lapses. 3-4 errors in paper. General continuity in presentation of ideas, smoothness, and economy of expression Consistent demonstration of precision and clarity. Paper is generally clear and focused. May have some unclear transitions or lack of coherence. Often anticipates reader’s need for information, explanation, and context. |
Points:3 (2.4%) Correct sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, and spelling evident. 5-6 errors in paper. Continuity in presentation of ideas, smoothness, and economy of expression, Consistent demonstration of precision and clarity. Paper is generally focused but has occasional wander of topic, unclear transitions, lack of coherence. Occasionally addresses reader’s need for information, explanation, and context. |
Points:2 (1.6%) Non-consistent sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, and spelling. 7-8 errors in paper. Intermittent continuity in presentation of ideas, smoothness, and economy of expression Some consistency in demonstration of precision and clarity. Does not fully appreciate reader’s need for information, explanation, and context. |
Points:1 (.8%) Several problems with sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Greater than 8 errors in paper. Lacks continuity in presentation of ideas, smoothness, and economy of expression, Minimal consistency in demonstration of precision and clarity. Lacks appreciation for reader’s need for information, explanation, and context. |
Points:0 (0%) Student did not complete this portion of the assignment. |
APA Format (5 points) |
Points:5 (4%) Excellent demonstration in use of correct APA format within the paper (title page, level of headings, margins, and spacing. Includes introduction, body, and conclusion. Inclusive of proper manuscript structure and tables/figures. Citations used and references appropriately within the paper. References page properly cited and formatted. Minimal of 6 scholarly resources excluding web resources There are 0-2 APA errors. |
Points:4 (3.2%) Consistently uses correct APA format within the paper (title page, level of headings, margins, and spacing. Includes introduction, body, and conclusion. Inclusive of proper manuscript structure and tables/figures. Citations used and references appropriately within the paper. References page properly cited and formatted. Uses 8-9 scholarly resources. There are 3-4 APA errors. |
Points:3 (2.4%) Inconsistently uses correct APA format within the paper (title page, level of headings, margins, and spacing. Includes introduction, body, and conclusion. Inclusive of proper manuscript structure and tables/figures. Citations used and references appropriately within the paper. References page properly cited and formatted. Uses 6-7 scholarly resources. There are 5-6 APA errors. |
Points:2 (1.6%) Occasionally uses correct APA format within the paper (title page, level of headings, margins, and spacing. Includes introduction, body, and conclusion. Inclusive of proper manuscript structure and tables/figures. Citations used and references appropriately within the paper. References page properly cited and formatted. Uses 6-7 scholarly resources. There are 7-8 APA errors. |
Points:1 (.8%) Lacks demonstration in use of APA format throughout paper. There are greater than 8 APA errors. |
Points:0 (0%) ![]() Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?Get your assignment on Discuss data mining and interpretation influences case management and utilization in healthcare from an APN perspective. completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW Student did not complete this portion of the assignment. |
Name:NU626 Paper Rubrics –
References:
Nursing Standards
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. (2018). Code of conduct for midwives. https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Professional-standards.aspx
Clinical Guidelines
Guideline Adaption Committee. (2016). Clinical practice guidelines and principles of care for people with dementia. NHMRC Partnership Centre for Dealing with Cognitive and Related Function Decline in Older People. https://cdpc.sydney.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/CDPC-Dementia-Guidelines_WEB.pdf
Living Guideline
Stroke Foundation. (2022). Australian and New Zealand living clinical guidelines for stroke management – chapter 1 of 8: Pre-hospital care. https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/NnV76E
Evidence-based practice
BMJ Best Practice
Goldfarb, S., & Josephson, M. (2020). Cystic fibrosis. BMJ Best Practice. https://bestpractice.bmj.com/
Schub, T., & Cabrera, G. (2018). Bites: Head lice [Evidence-based care sheet]. Cinahl Information Systems. https://www.ebscohost.com
Beyea, S. C., & Slattery, M. J. (2006). Evidence-based practice in nursing: A guide to successful implementation. http://www.hcmarketplace.com/supplemental/3737_browse.pdf
JBI: Evidence summary
Swe, K. K. (2022). Blood glucose levels: Self-monitoring [Evidence summary]. JBI EBP Database. https://jbi.global
JBI: Best practice information sheet
Bellman, S. (2022). Experiences of living with juvenile idiopathic arthritis [Best practice information sheet]. JBI EBP Database, 24(1), 1-4.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Srijithesh, P. R., Aghoram, R., Goel, A., & Dhanya, J. (2019). Positional therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010990.pub2
Drug Information
Codeine. (2023, January). In Australian medicines handbook. Retrieved February 2, 2023, from https://amhonline.amh.net.au
Colorado State University. (2011). Why assign WID tasks? http://wac.colostate.edu/intro/com6a1.cfm
Dartmouth Writing Program. (2005). Writing in the social sciences. http://www.dartmouth.edu/~writing/materials/student/soc_sciences/write.shtml
Rutherford, M. (2008). Standardized nursing language: What does it mean for nursing practice? [Abstract]. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 13(1). http://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ThePracticeofProfessionalNursing/Health-IT/StandardizedNursingLanguage.html
Wagner, D. (n.d.). Why writing matters in nursing. https://www.svsu.edu/nursing/programs/bsn/programrequirements/whywritingmatters/
Writing in nursing: Examples. (n.d.). http://www.technorhetoric.net/7.2/sectionone/inman/examples.html
Perth Children’s Hospital. (2022, April). Appendicitis [Emergency Department Guidelines]. Child and Adolescent Health Service. https://www.pch.health.wa.gov.au/For-health-professionals/Emergency-Department-Guidelines/Appendicitis
Department of Health. (n.d.). Who is being active in Western Australia? https://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/Articles/U_Z/Who-is-being-active-in-Western-Australia
Donaldson, L. (Ed.). (2017, May 1). Healthier, fairer, safer: The global health journey 2007-2017. World Health Organisation. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241512367
NCBI Bookshelf
Rodriguez Ziccardi, M., Goyal, G., & Maani, C. V. (2020, August 10). Atrial flutter. In Statpearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK540985/
Royal Perth Hospital. (2016). Procedural management: Pre and post (24-48 hours) NPS. Canvas. https://courses.ecu.edu.au
Explanation & Answer
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.