Evaluation of Healthcare Technology
Description
Evaluation of Health Care Technology
For this assignment, you will utilize content from the
course materials as well as additional qualified resources to synthesize new
information that you can apply towards your DPI Project, your future work area,
or your clinical practice as a DNP-prepared nurse.
General Guidelines:
Use the following information to ensure successful
completion of the assignment:
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric
prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their
writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success
Center.
Use primary sources published within the last 5 years.
Provide citations and references for all sources used.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
For this assignment, write a 1,000-1,250 word paper in which
you:
Select a technology that has been explored in the course.
Using the technology you have selected, define and describe
how the element would be measured or evaluated.
Using the content in the textbook and other readings, list
three elements that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface.
Perform an assessment using elements of user-technology
interface or human factors methods to determine functionality.
For each element, propose practicable suggestions for
improvement using support from the literature.
Portfolio Practice Hours
It may be possible to earn Portfolio Practice hours for this
case report. Enter the following after the references section of your paper:

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Evaluation of Healthcare Technology completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Unformatted Attachment Preview
DNP-805
Class Code
DNP-805-O503
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Selection of a Specific Technology Explored in
This Course
10.0%
Assessment Performed Using Elements of UserTechnology Interface or Human Factors Methods
to Determine Existing Functionality of the
Specified Technology
15.0%
List With Support for Three Elements of the
Specified Technology That Will Be Used to
Evaluate the User-Technology Interface Using
the Course Content
15.0%
Definition of Each Element of the Specified
Technology Identified and Description of How
Each Element Would Be Measured or Evaluated
15.0%
Proposal That Employs Support From the
Literature to Provide Practicable Suggestions for
Improvement in the Use of Each Element of the
Specified Technology
15.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Evaluation of Health Care Technology
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is
not present.
An assessment using elements of user-technology interface
or human factors methods to determine existing functionality
of the specified technology is not present.
A list with support of three elements of the specified
technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology
interface using the course content is not present.
A definition of each element of the specified technology
identified and a description of how each element would be
measured or evaluated are not present.
A proposal that employs support from the literature to
provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use
of each element of the specified technology is not present.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice
and/or sentence construction are used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
150.0
Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)
Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is
marginal or incomplete.
An assessment using elements of user-technology interface
or human factors methods to determine existing functionality
of the specified technology is marginal or incomplete.
A list with support of three elements of the specified
technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology
interface using the course content is present but marginal or
incomplete.
A definition of each element of the specified technology
identified and a description of how each element would be
measured or evaluated are present but marginal or
incomplete.
A proposal that employs support from the literature to
provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use
of each element of the specified technology is present but
marginal or incomplete.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is
perfunctory.
An assessment using elements of user-technology interface
or human factors methods to determine existing functionality
of the specified technology is present but at a perfunctory
level.
A list with support of three elements of the specified
technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology
interface using the course content is present but at a
perfunctory level.
A definition of each element of the specified technology
identified and a description of how each element would be
measured or evaluated are present but at a perfunctory level.
A proposal that employs support from the literature to
provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use
of each element of the specified technology is present but at
a perfunctory level.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is
present. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is
from scholarly though dated sources.
An assessment using elements of user-technology interface
or human factors methods to determine existing functionality
of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is
convincing and defines specific elements. Information
presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
A list with support of three elements of the specified
technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology
interface using the course content is present in full.
Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements.
Information presented is from scholarly though dated
sources.
A definition of each element of the specified technology
identified and a description of how each element would be
measured or evaluated are present in full. Discussion is
convincing and defines specific elements. Information
presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
A proposal that employs support from the literature to
provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use
of each element of the specified technology is present in full.
Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements.
Information presented is from scholarly though dated
sources.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident.
There is a smooth
progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most
sources are authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech are used.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is
present. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking.
Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
An assessment using elements of user-technology interface
or human factors methods to determine existing functionality
of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is
convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is
insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is
from current scholarly sources.
A list with support of three elements of the specified
technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology
interface using the course content is present in full.
Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements.
Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information
presented is from current scholarly sources.
A definition of each element of the specified technology
identified and a description of how each element would be
measured or evaluated are present in full. Discussion is
convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is
insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is
from current scholarly sources.
A proposal that employs support from the literature to
provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use
of each element of the specified technology is present in full.
Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements.
Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information
presented is from current scholarly sources.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Comments
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Tags:
nursing
DNP
Healthcare informatics

References:
Nursing Standards
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. (2018). Code of conduct for midwives. https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Professional-standards.aspx
Clinical Guidelines
Guideline Adaption Committee. (2016). Clinical practice guidelines and principles of care for people with dementia. NHMRC Partnership Centre for Dealing with Cognitive and Related Function Decline in Older People. https://cdpc.sydney.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/CDPC-Dementia-Guidelines_WEB.pdf
Living Guideline
Stroke Foundation. (2022). Australian and New Zealand living clinical guidelines for stroke management – chapter 1 of 8: Pre-hospital care. https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/NnV76E
Evidence-based practice
BMJ Best Practice
Goldfarb, S., & Josephson, M. (2020). Cystic fibrosis. BMJ Best Practice. https://bestpractice.bmj.com/
Schub, T., & Cabrera, G. (2018). Bites: Head lice [Evidence-based care sheet]. Cinahl Information Systems. https://www.ebscohost.com
Beyea, S. C., & Slattery, M. J. (2006). Evidence-based practice in nursing: A guide to successful implementation. http://www.hcmarketplace.com/supplemental/3737_browse.pdf
JBI: Evidence summary
Swe, K. K. (2022). Blood glucose levels: Self-monitoring [Evidence summary]. JBI EBP Database. https://jbi.global
JBI: Best practice information sheet
Bellman, S. (2022). Experiences of living with juvenile idiopathic arthritis [Best practice information sheet]. JBI EBP Database, 24(1), 1-4.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Srijithesh, P. R., Aghoram, R., Goel, A., & Dhanya, J. (2019). Positional therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010990.pub2
Drug Information
Codeine. (2023, January). In Australian medicines handbook. Retrieved February 2, 2023, from https://amhonline.amh.net.au
Colorado State University. (2011). Why assign WID tasks? http://wac.colostate.edu/intro/com6a1.cfm
Dartmouth Writing Program. (2005). Writing in the social sciences. http://www.dartmouth.edu/~writing/materials/student/soc_sciences/write.shtml
Rutherford, M. (2008). Standardized nursing language: What does it mean for nursing practice? [Abstract]. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 13(1). http://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ThePracticeofProfessionalNursing/Health-IT/StandardizedNursingLanguage.html
Wagner, D. (n.d.). Why writing matters in nursing. https://www.svsu.edu/nursing/programs/bsn/programrequirements/whywritingmatters/
Writing in nursing: Examples. (n.d.). http://www.technorhetoric.net/7.2/sectionone/inman/examples.html
Perth Children’s Hospital. (2022, April). Appendicitis [Emergency Department Guidelines]. Child and Adolescent Health Service. https://www.pch.health.wa.gov.au/For-health-professionals/Emergency-Department-Guidelines/Appendicitis
Department of Health. (n.d.). Who is being active in Western Australia? https://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/Articles/U_Z/Who-is-being-active-in-Western-Australia
Donaldson, L. (Ed.). (2017, May 1). Healthier, fairer, safer: The global health journey 2007-2017. World Health Organisation. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241512367
NCBI Bookshelf
Rodriguez Ziccardi, M., Goyal, G., & Maani, C. V. (2020, August 10). Atrial flutter. In Statpearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK540985/
Royal Perth Hospital. (2016). Procedural management: Pre and post (24-48 hours) NPS. Canvas. https://courses.ecu.edu.au
Explanation & Answer
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.